Fast Filters

&

Premier League iconPremier League
Liverpool FC logoArsenal FC logo
In 0m
LIV vs ARS

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Juventus FC logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
JUV vs NAP

Browse

Vienna logoVienna
LT
Alex de Minaur logo
In 0m
TIE vs MIN(18/8)

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Real Racing Club de Santander logoReal Madrid CF logo
In 0m
SAN vs RMA

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Philadelphia Flyers logoColumbus Blue Jackets logo
In 0m
FLY vs JAC

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
FC Barcelona logoDeportivo Alavés logo
In 0m
FCB vs ALA

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Boston Celtics logoBrooklyn Nets logo
In 0m
CEL vs NET

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Los Angeles Lakers logoPortland Trail Blazers logo
In 0m
LAK vs BLA

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Dallas Stars logoNew Jersey Devils logo
In 0m
STA vs DEV

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Athletic Club logoReal Sociedad de Fútbol logo
In 0m
ATH vs RSO

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Levante UD logoClub Atlético de Madrid logo
In 0m
LEV vs ATL

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Newcastle United FC logoEverton FC logo
In 0m
NEW vs EVE

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Chicago Blackhawks logoLos Angeles Kings logo
In 0m
BLA vs KIN

Browse

UEFA Champions League iconUEFA Champions League
FK Shakhtar Donetsk logoSporting Clube de Portugal logo
In 0m
SHD vs SPO

Browse

NBA logoNBA
New York Knicks logoDetroit Pistons logo
In 0m
KNI vs PIS

Browse

NBA logoNBA
San Antonio Spurs logoSacramento Kings logo
In 0m
SPU vs KIN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Winnipeg Jets logoFlorida Panthers logo
In 0m
JET vs PAN

Browse

UEFA Champions League iconUEFA Champions League
Galatasaray SK logoVfB Stuttgart logo
In 0m
GAL vs VFB

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
US Sassuolo Calcio logoSS Lazio logo
46'
SAS 2–4 LAZ

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Genoa CFC logoJuventus FC logo
In 0m
GEN vs JUV

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Carolina Hurricanes logoBoston Bruins logo
In 0m
HUR vs BRU

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Venezia FC logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
VEN vs INT

Browse

NHL logoNHL
St. Louis Blues logoMontreal Canadiens logo
In 0m
BLU vs CAN

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Monza logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
MON vs NAP

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Chelsea FC logoManchester United FC logo
In 0m
CHE vs MUN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Manchester City FC logoBrighton & Hove Albion FC logo
In 0m
MCI vs BHA

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Utah Mammoth logoMinnesota Wild logo
In 0m
MAM vs WIL

Browse

Bundesliga iconBundesliga
FC Bayern München logoBorussia Dortmund logo
In 0m
FCB vs BVB

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Washington Capitals logoPhiladelphia Flyers logo
In 0m
CAP vs FLY

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Milan logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
MIL vs INT

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Tottenham Hotspur FC logoCrystal Palace FC logo
In 0m
TOT vs CRY

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Aston Villa FC logoFulham FC logo
In 0m
AVL vs FUL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Vegas Golden Knights logoOttawa Senators logo
In 0m
KNI vs SEN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Brentford FC logoNottingham Forest FC logo
In 0m
BRE vs NOT

Browse

NHL logoNHL
San Jose Sharks logoBuffalo Sabres logo
In 0m
SHA vs SAB

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
AFC Bournemouth logoLeeds United FC logo
In 0m
BOU vs LEE

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Nashville Predators logoNew York Islanders logo
In 0m
PRE vs ISL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Anaheim Ducks logoVancouver Canucks logo
In 0m
DUC vs CAN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Edmonton Oilers logoCalgary Flames logo
In 0m
OIL vs FLA

Browse

QPR VS Preston NE Prediction & Betting Tips - AI Analysis & Odds (Sep 19, 2026)

Queens Park Rangers FC logo

QPR

FT
2 - 2

HT: 0-2

Preston North End FC logo

Preston NE

Championship·Loftus Road

Comparison of analyst and AI predictions

Predicto AI

Predicto AI

Correct

Over 2.5 goals

@1.85
View Reasoning
The bet for Over 2.5 goals is justified as Preston North End FC has a high O2.5 percentage of 70%, indicating their games often feature multiple goals. Additionally, the historical data shows that in their last 10 matches, a total of 24 goals were scored, averaging 2.4 goals per match. Considering these statistics, estim.
Human Analyst

Human Analyst

Correct

Both Teams to Score

@1.75
View Reasoning
Both Teams to Score is a strong bet considering that Queens Park Rangers FC has a BTTS percentage of 55%, while Preston North End FC boasts a higher 65%. With a history of 24 total goals in their last 10 encounters, it's likely both teams will find the net in this matchup. Given these stats, estim.
Split call — see both takes above

Key Stats

QPRper gamePreston
1.7
xG for
1.3
0.9
xG against
1.3
51.2
Possession %
42.8
16.8
Shots
13.2
QPR — last 5
DLWWD
Preston — last 5
LWLLL

Overview

QPR currently sit 4th with 11 points from 6 games, showing solid form with a recent DLWWD run. Preston struggle near the bottom, 24th with 3 points, and a poor LWLLL sequence. Last season, QPR averaged 1.3 goals and conceded 1.6 per game, while Preston scored 1.2 and conceded 1.3. This season's small sample suggests QPR's attack is slightly more potent (xG 1.68 vs 1.25) and defense tighter (0.87 xGA vs 1.29).

Form & xG

QPR's 1.68 xG per game and 1.17 actual goals indicate slight underperformance in front of goal, while Preston's 1.25 xG vs 1.0 actual goal suggests inefficiency. Defensively, QPR's xGA of 0.87 aligns with 0.67 goals conceded, highlighting better defensive solidity than Preston, who concede 2 goals per game versus 1.29 xGA. QPR's 51.2% possession and 16.8 shots (5.5 on target) per game contrast with Preston's 42.8% possession and 13.2 shots (3.2 OT), indicating QPR's dominance.

Team News & Key Players

QPR's Rumarn Burrell shines with 2 goals, 1 assist, 2.05 shots and 0.91 OT per 90, plus 2.28 key passes. H. Vale adds creativity (3.25 KP/90) and 2.5 shots/90. Preston's J. Thompson is their top contributor with 1 goal, 1 assist, 1.28 shots and KP per 90, but overall Preston's attack lacks finishing. Defensively, QPR's Jimmy Dunne (1 goal, 1.1 tackles/90) and Ronnie Edwards (1 assist, 1.6 tackles/90) offer solidity, while Preston's Leroy commits 1.6 fouls and 2 yellow cards per 90, hinting at disciplinary risks.

Stats & Betting Angles

QPR average 7 corners per game, Preston only 3.8, indicating attacking pressure differences. BTTS occurred in 50% QPR games this season and 83% Preston's, reflecting Preston's leaky defense and QPR's scoring consistency. Both teams have low clean sheet rates (QPR 33%, Preston 0% this season). Head-to-head recent matches feature tight scorelines: three 1-1 draws and multiple 2-1 or 1-0 results, suggesting a competitive fixture with goals likely. Over 2.5 goals occurred in 50% QPR games and 83% Preston's this season.

Verdict

QPR's superior form, better underlying metrics, and home advantage suggest they will edge this match. Preston's defensive frailty and high BTTS rate make goals likely at both ends. Expect a competitive game with QPR scoring at least twice, Preston likely to find the net once. The last six H2H show an average of 2.0 goals per game, but current attacking trends favor a 3-goal match with BTTS.

Martin Anderson
Martin Anderson
Human analyst

Professional betting analyst with 10+ years of experience in sports data analytics and statistics. Featured on The Athletic, 433, and ESPN. Currently maintaining a 70% win rate this season across European football markets. See the public track record.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does recent form impact this QPR vs Preston match?

QPR’s recent form (DLWWD) with 11 points from 6 games contrasts sharply with Preston’s LWLLL and just 3 points. QPR’s better form correlates with their 1.68 xG per game compared to Preston’s 1.25, showing they create more and better chances. Preston’s 2 goals conceded per game highlight defensive issues, making their form less reliable. This disparity suggests QPR have momentum advantage.

What does the xG profile tell us about both teams?

QPR’s xG of 1.68 exceeds their 1.17 goals, indicating slight underperformance but good chance creation. Preston’s xG of 1.25 is higher than their 1 goal scored, showing finishing inefficiency. Defensively, QPR allow 0.87 xGA vs 0.67 actual goals conceded, while Preston concede 2 goals vs 1.29 xGA, suggesting Preston’s defense is underperforming. Overall, QPR’s stronger xG profile signals better attacking and defensive balance.

Who are the key attackers and their per-90 contributions?

For QPR, Rumarn Burrell leads with 2 goals, 1 assist, 2.05 shots and 0.91 on target per 90, plus 2.28 key passes, indicating a high involvement in chances. H. Vale adds 2.5 shots and 3.25 key passes per 90. Preston’s top attacker J. Thompson has 1 goal, 1 assist, 1.28 shots and key passes per 90, but overall Preston lacks finishing power as no other player has scored yet.

What defensive weaknesses might influence the match outcome?

Preston concede 2 goals per game, double their xGA (1.29), indicating defensive frailty or errors. They have zero clean sheets this season, while QPR have 33%. Preston’s Leroy commits 1.6 fouls and 2 yellow cards per 90, risking suspensions or defensive lapses. QPR concede fewer chances (0.87 xGA) and goals (0.67), suggesting a more stable defense likely to exploit Preston’s weaknesses.

Why is BTTS (both teams to score) likely in this fixture?

BTTS has occurred in 50% of QPR’s games this season and 83% of Preston’s, reflecting Preston’s leaky defense and QPR’s consistent scoring. Preston have zero clean sheets so far, while QPR have scored in 67% of matches. The head-to-head history shows six of the last eight matches ended with both teams scoring, including multiple 2-1 and 1-1 results.

What supports an over/under 2.5 goals bet here?

Over 2.5 goals occurred in 50% of QPR’s matches and 83% of Preston’s this season, suggesting a good chance for at least 3 goals. Last season, QPR averaged 2.9 goals per match combined with Preston when they met (e.g., 2-1, 1-2, 2-1). Current attacking metrics and high BTTS rates reinforce the likelihood of a higher-scoring game.

What do recent head-to-head results suggest about this fixture?

The last eight meetings show close contests: three 1-1 draws and multiple 2-1 or 1-0 results, with an average of 2.0 goals per game. QPR have won four of last eight, Preston two, with two draws. The pattern suggests a competitive game with goals, supporting a narrow QPR win with both teams scoring.

Is there betting value in backing QPR in this match?

QPR’s stronger xG (1.68 vs 1.25), better defensive metrics (0.87 xGA vs 1.29), superior home form, and Preston’s disciplinary issues (Leroy’s 2 yellows/90) suggest QPR are undervalued at typical odds. Preston’s scoring inefficiency and defensive frailty increase QPR’s chances. Backing QPR to win with BTTS and Over 2.5 goals offers a balanced, value-backed bet.

Explore more predictions

Best betting partners on this match

Top pick
Roobet logo

Roobet

10.0

Instant Rakeback + $100K Weekly Raffle

Why we picked this: Official betting partner of Chelsea FC in Latin America

Reviewed by our team
visa
tether
bitcoin
ethereum
usd_coin
22Bet logo

22Bet

9.9

100% Welcome Bonus up to €122

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Betwinner logo

Betwinner

9.5

Exclusive 100% Sports Bonus up to $130

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Megapari logo

Megapari

9.7

200% Welcome Bonus up to $100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Melbet logo

Melbet

9.3

100% Sportsbook Bonus up to €100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
1WIN logo

1WIN

8.9

500% Welcome Package up to €1000

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+

This match has ended

See Today's Picks
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our cookie policy.