Fast Filters

&

Premier League iconPremier League
Liverpool FC logoArsenal FC logo
In 0m
LIV vs ARS

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Juventus FC logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
JUV vs NAP

Browse

Vienna logoVienna
LT
Alex de Minaur logo
In 0m
TIE vs MIN(18/8)

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Real Racing Club de Santander logoReal Madrid CF logo
In 0m
SAN vs RMA

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Philadelphia Flyers logoColumbus Blue Jackets logo
In 0m
FLY vs JAC

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
FC Barcelona logoDeportivo Alavés logo
In 0m
FCB vs ALA

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Boston Celtics logoBrooklyn Nets logo
In 0m
CEL vs NET

Browse

Vienna logoVienna
Karen Khachanov logoCarlos Alcaraz logo
In 0m
KHA vs ALC(25/3)

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Los Angeles Lakers logoPortland Trail Blazers logo
In 0m
LAK vs BLA

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Dallas Stars logoNew Jersey Devils logo
In 0m
STA vs DEV

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Athletic Club logoReal Sociedad de Fútbol logo
In 0m
ATH vs RSO

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Levante UD logoClub Atlético de Madrid logo
In 0m
LEV vs ATL

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Villarreal CF logoRCD Espanyol de Barcelona logo
In 0m
VIL vs ESP

Browse

NHL logoNHL
St. Louis Blues logoMontreal Canadiens logo
In 0m
BLU vs CAN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Newcastle United FC logoEverton FC logo
In 0m
NEW vs EVE

Browse

NBA logoNBA
New York Knicks logoDetroit Pistons logo
In 0m
KNI vs PIS

Browse

NBA logoNBA
San Antonio Spurs logoSacramento Kings logo
In 0m
SPU vs KIN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Winnipeg Jets logoFlorida Panthers logo
In 0m
JET vs PAN

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Genoa CFC logoJuventus FC logo
In 0m
GEN vs JUV

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Venezia FC logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
VEN vs INT

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Monza logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
MON vs NAP

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Carolina Hurricanes logoBoston Bruins logo
In 0m
HUR vs BRU

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Milan logoBologna FC 1909 logo
In 0m
MIL vs BOL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Chicago Blackhawks logoLos Angeles Kings logo
In 0m
BLA vs KIN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Chelsea FC logoManchester United FC logo
In 0m
CHE vs MUN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Manchester City FC logoBrighton & Hove Albion FC logo
In 0m
MCI vs BHA

Browse

Bundesliga iconBundesliga
FC Bayern München logoBorussia Dortmund logo
In 0m
FCB vs BVB

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Utah Mammoth logoMinnesota Wild logo
In 0m
MAM vs WIL

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Milan logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
MIL vs INT

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Vegas Golden Knights logoOttawa Senators logo
In 0m
KNI vs SEN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Tottenham Hotspur FC logoCrystal Palace FC logo
In 0m
TOT vs CRY

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Aston Villa FC logoFulham FC logo
In 0m
AVL vs FUL

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Brentford FC logoNottingham Forest FC logo
In 0m
BRE vs NOT

Browse

NHL logoNHL
San Jose Sharks logoBuffalo Sabres logo
In 0m
SHA vs SAB

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
AFC Bournemouth logoLeeds United FC logo
In 0m
BOU vs LEE

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Nashville Predators logoNew York Islanders logo
In 0m
PRE vs ISL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Anaheim Ducks logoVancouver Canucks logo
In 0m
DUC vs CAN

Browse

New England VS Chicago Fire Prediction & Betting Tips - AI Analysis & Odds (Oct 17, 2026)

New England Revolution logo

New England

FT
1 - 0

HT: 1-0

Chicago Fire FC logo

Chicago Fire

MLS·Gillette Stadium

Comparison of analyst and AI predictions

Predicto AI

Predicto AI

Incorrect

Both Teams to Score

@1.44
View Reasoning
Both teams have shown a high likelihood of scoring, with BTTS percentages of 65% for New England Revolution and 80% for Chicago Fire FC. The teams’ recent forms and their head-to-head record, which features multiple high-scoring matches, further support the expectation that both teams will find the back of the net. Therefore, the Both Teams to Score market looks promising for this match.
Human Analyst

Human Analyst

Incorrect

Over 2.5 goals

@1.51
View Reasoning
The New England Revolution and Chicago Fire FC both have strong attacking records, averaging over 2.5 goals in 70% and 75% of their matches, respectively. Additionally, their head-to-head encounters have produced a total of 31 goals in the last 10 matches, indicating a high-scoring trend. Given these factors, betting on Over 2.5 goals is a reasonable prediction.
Split call — see both takes above

Key Stats

New England Revolutionper gameChicago Fire
1.5
xG for
1.8
1.3
xG against
1.3
50.8
Possession %
51.7
12.1
Shots
14
New England Revolution — last 5
LWWWW
Chicago Fire — last 5
WLLDD

Overview

New England Revolution currently sit 2nd in the standings with 46 points, while Chicago Fire are 5th with 42 points. Despite New England's slightly better position, Chicago's last full season baseline showed stronger offensive output with 2.0 goals per game compared to New England's 1.3. This match is critical for both teams in the playoff race, with New England's recent form strong (LWWWW) and Chicago more inconsistent (WLLDD).

Form & xG

This season, New England averages 1.69 goals scored and concedes 1.31, with an xG of 1.54 for and 1.31 against, indicating some clinical finishing above expected. Chicago Fire have a similar goals scored rate (1.77) and concede slightly more (1.46) with an xG of 1.77 for and 1.3 against. Both teams have high BTTS rates this season—62% for New England and 69% for Chicago—suggesting goals at both ends are likely.

Team News & Key Players

New England's leading contributors include Carles Gil (11 goals, 4 assists, 7.62 rating) averaging 1.58 shots and 2.85 key passes per 90. D. Turgeman also provides attacking threat with 7 goals and 7 assists. Chicago's key man is P. Zinckernagel, with 5 goals and 8 assists, 2.36 shots and key passes per 90. M. Haile-Selassie adds 8 goals and 4 assists, showing strong offensive output from a defensive position.

Stats & Betting Angles

Both teams average around 4.5 corners per game and commit a high number of fouls (New England 9.8, Chicago 12.5), with Chicago receiving more yellow cards (2.19 vs 1.84). BTTS and Over 2.5 goals have hit in 62-73% of their games this season, supported by last season’s baseline of 1.3-1.5 goals conceded per game each. The recent H2H is tight but with multiple scorelines over 2.5 goals, including a 2-2 and 3-2 in the past year.

Verdict

Expect a competitive fixture with goals at both ends given both teams’ attacking quality and defensive vulnerabilities. The presence of prolific attackers like Gil and Zinckernagel combined with high BTTS and Over 2.5 rates this season and last season's baseline supports a 2-1 scoreline favoring New England at home. The small sample size this season urges caution, but the last season baseline and H2H trends reinforce this outlook.

Martin Anderson
Martin Anderson
Human analyst

Professional betting analyst with 10+ years of experience in sports data analytics and statistics. Featured on The Athletic, 433, and ESPN. Currently maintaining a 70% win rate this season across European football markets. See the public track record.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does recent form influence the expected outcome?

New England's recent form is strong with 4 wins in their last 5 games (LWWWW), scoring 1.69 goals per game this season with an xG of 1.54, indicating good finishing. Chicago's form is less consistent (WLLDD), scoring slightly more (1.77 goals, xG 1.77) but conceding more (1.46). This suggests New England's momentum and defensive solidity (1.31 conceded) could give them the edge.

What do the xG numbers reveal about each team's attacking and defensive quality?

New England's xG this season is 1.54 for and 1.31 against, showing their attack slightly outperforms chances created, while their defense aligns with goals conceded. Chicago has a higher xG for at 1.77 but concedes 1.3 xG per game, indicating a more potent but less stable defense. Last season, Chicago averaged 2.0 goals scored, New England 1.3, highlighting Chicago's stronger baseline attack.

Which key attackers are likely to influence this match and how do their per-90 stats support this?

Carles Gil (New England) averages 1.58 shots and 2.85 key passes per 90 with 11 goals and 4 assists this season, making him a central creative force. Chicago's P. Zinckernagel has 2.36 shots and key passes per 90 with 5 goals and 8 assists, indicating his dual threat. Both players’ involvement suggests a high chance of goals from midfield creativity.

How do defensive vulnerabilities impact the likelihood of both teams scoring?

New England concedes 1.31 goals per game with a 19% clean sheet rate, while Chicago concedes 1.46 with a 27% clean sheet rate. Both have conceded over 1.3 goals on average this season and last, supporting the high BTTS percentages (62% and 69%). Defensive frailty combined with strong attacking players raises confidence in both teams scoring.

Why is BTTS a strong betting angle for this fixture?

BTTS has occurred in 62% of New England's and 69% of Chicago's games this season. Both teams have conceded over 1.3 goals per game on average and possess creative midfielders like Gil and Zinckernagel who produce chances at rates above 2 key passes per 90. Their H2H also features multiple high-scoring draws and wins, reinforcing BTTS as a high-probability bet.

What supports the over 2.5 goals prediction in this match?

Over 2.5 goals occurred in 69% of New England's and 73% of Chicago's games this season. Their combined goals per game (3.46) and xG (3.31) support a match with multiple goals. H2H history shows several matches with 3+ goals, including 3-2 and 2-2 scorelines. Both teams' attacking per-90 stats and defensive concessions further justify the over 2.5 prediction.

How does the recent head-to-head history shape expectations for this game?

The last ten meetings have been tight but high-scoring affairs, including 2-2 draws (2025-10-18, 2023-09-24) and a 3-2 win for Chicago (2025-09-07). New England won the most recent encounter 2-1 (2026-09-13). This pattern of close, goal-filled matches supports a competitive game with likely goals on both sides.

Where lies the best betting value in this fixture?

Given the strong BTTS (62-69%) and Over 2.5 (69-73%) rates combined with New England's slight home advantage and recent form, betting on a 2-1 home win with BTTS and Over 2.5 goals offers value. Chicago's attacking baseline and high xG suggest they will score, but New England's defensive improvement this season supports a narrow home win.

Explore more predictions

Best betting partners on this match

Top pick
Roobet logo

Roobet

10.0

Instant Rakeback + $100K Weekly Raffle

Why we picked this: Official betting partner of Chelsea FC in Latin America

Reviewed by our team
visa
tether
bitcoin
ethereum
usd_coin
22Bet logo

22Bet

9.9

100% Welcome Bonus up to €122

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Betwinner logo

Betwinner

9.5

Exclusive 100% Sports Bonus up to $130

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Megapari logo

Megapari

9.7

200% Welcome Bonus up to $100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Melbet logo

Melbet

9.3

100% Sportsbook Bonus up to €100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
1WIN logo

1WIN

8.9

500% Welcome Package up to €1000

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+

This match has ended

See Today's Picks
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our cookie policy.