Fast Filters

&

Premier League iconPremier League
Liverpool FC logoArsenal FC logo
In 0m
LIV vs ARS

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Juventus FC logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
JUV vs NAP

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Real Racing Club de Santander logoReal Madrid CF logo
In 0m
SAN vs RMA

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Dallas Stars logoNew York Islanders logo
In 0m
STA vs ISL

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
FC Barcelona logoDeportivo Alavés logo
In 0m
FCB vs ALA

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Utah Jazz logoLos Angeles Lakers logo
In 0m
JAZ vs LAK

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Brooklyn Nets logoIndiana Pacers logo
In 0m
NET vs PAC

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Winnipeg Jets logoMontreal Canadiens logo
In 0m
JET vs CAN

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Athletic Club logoReal Sociedad de Fútbol logo
In 0m
ATH vs RSO

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Villarreal CF logoRCD Espanyol de Barcelona logo
In 0m
VIL vs ESP

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Levante UD logoClub Atlético de Madrid logo
In 0m
LEV vs ATL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Nashville Predators logoColorado Avalanche logo
In 0m
PRE vs AVA

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
FC Barcelona logoReal Madrid CF logo
In 0m
FCB vs RMA

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Philadelphia 76ers logoDetroit Pistons logo
In 0m
76E vs PIS

Browse

NBA logoNBA
New York Knicks logoOrlando Magic logo
In 0m
KNI vs MAG

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Vancouver Canucks logoMinnesota Wild logo
In 0m
CAN vs WIL

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Udinese Calcio logoAC Milan logo
5'
UDI 0–0 MIL

Browse

Eredivisie iconEredivisie
AZ logoFC Twente '65 logo
HT
AZ 0–0 TWE

Browse

Liga Portugal iconLiga Portugal
CD Nacional logoSporting Clube de Braga logo
86'
CDN 1–0 SCB

Browse

NHL logoNHL
New York Rangers logoLos Angeles Kings logo
In 0m
RAN vs KIN

Browse

Liga Portugal iconLiga Portugal
Rio Ave FC logoFC Famalicão logo
90'
RIO 0–3 FAM

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Minnesota Timberwolves logoToronto Raptors logo
In 0m
TIM vs RAP

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Oklahoma City Thunder logoLos Angeles Clippers logo
In 0m
THU vs CLI

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Edmonton Oilers logoDetroit Red Wings logo
In 0m
OIL vs WIN

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Genoa CFC logoJuventus FC logo
In 0m
GEN vs JUV

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Venezia FC logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
VEN vs INT

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Monza logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
MON vs NAP

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Calgary Flames logoToronto Maple Leafs logo
In 0m
FLA vs LEA

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Milan logoBologna FC 1909 logo
In 0m
MIL vs BOL

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Cleveland Cavaliers logoMinnesota Timberwolves logo
In 0m
CAV vs TIM

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Miami Heat logoDallas Mavericks logo
In 0m
HEA vs MAV

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Philadelphia Flyers logoColumbus Blue Jackets logo
In 0m
FLY vs JAC

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Chelsea FC logoManchester United FC logo
In 0m
CHE vs MUN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Manchester City FC logoBrighton & Hove Albion FC logo
In 0m
MCI vs BHA

Browse

Bundesliga iconBundesliga
FC Bayern München logoBorussia Dortmund logo
In 0m
FCB vs BVB

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Dallas Stars logoNew Jersey Devils logo
In 0m
STA vs DEV

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Milan logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
MIL vs INT

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Sacramento Kings logoMemphis Grizzlies logo
In 0m
KIN vs GRI

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Charlotte Hornets logoWashington Wizards logo
In 0m
HOR vs WIZ

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Winnipeg Jets logoFlorida Panthers logo
In 0m
JET vs PAN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Tottenham Hotspur FC logoCrystal Palace FC logo
In 0m
TOT vs CRY

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Aston Villa FC logoFulham FC logo
In 0m
AVL vs FUL

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Brentford FC logoNottingham Forest FC logo
In 0m
BRE vs NOT

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Chicago Blackhawks logoLos Angeles Kings logo
In 0m
BLA vs KIN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
AFC Bournemouth logoLeeds United FC logo
In 0m
BOU vs LEE

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Carolina Hurricanes logoBoston Bruins logo
In 0m
HUR vs BRU

Browse

NHL logoNHL
St. Louis Blues logoMontreal Canadiens logo
In 0m
BLU vs CAN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Utah Mammoth logoMinnesota Wild logo
In 0m
MAM vs WIL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Vegas Golden Knights logoOttawa Senators logo
In 0m
KNI vs SEN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Nashville Predators logoNew York Islanders logo
In 0m
PRE vs ISL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Anaheim Ducks logoVancouver Canucks logo
In 0m
DUC vs CAN

Browse

Juventus VS NEC Prediction & Betting Tips - AI Analysis & Odds (Sep 17, 2026)

Juventus FC logo

Juventus

FT
5 - 0

HT: 3-0

NEC logo

NEC

UEFA Europa League·Allianz Stadium

Comparison of analyst and AI predictions

Predicto AI

Predicto AI

Correct

Over 2.5 goals

@1.42
View Reasoning
The statistics suggest a high likelihood of more than 2.5 goals in this match, especially considering NEC's O2.5 rate of 65%. Juventus, with a total of 31 goals scored, also contributes to a potentially high-scoring game. With both teams being relatively attacking-minded, betting on over 2.5 goals appears to be a sound choice.
Human Analyst

Human Analyst

Incorrect

Both Teams to Score

@2.06
View Reasoning
Both teams have shown a strong tendency to score in recent matches, with NEC boasting an impressive BTTS rate of 85%. Juventus, while slightly lower at 45%, still has a solid offensive record with 31 goals scored this season. Given these stats, the likelihood of both teams finding the net is high.
Split call — see both takes above

Key Stats

Juventusper gameNEC Nijmegen
1.9
xG for
2.4
0.3
xG against
1.7
56.7
Possession %
62.3
18.3
Shots
18.7
Juventus — last 5
DWW
NEC Nijmegen — last 5
WWL

Overview

Juventus and NEC Nijmegen meet in a cup tie with both sides yet to earn points in this competition. Juventus currently sit 16th while NEC is 24th, reflecting a challenging start. Juventus shows a modest attack with 1.33 goals per game and a strong defensive record conceding just 0.33, supported by an xG of 1.88 for and 0.33 against. NEC Nijmegen exhibits a more aggressive approach, averaging 2.67 goals scored and 1.33 conceded per game with an xG of 2.36 and 1.71 conceded. Both teams have small samples this season, so last season's baseline is not available, increasing uncertainty.

Form & xG

Juventus's recent form is DWW with an xG of 1.88, indicating they slightly underperform their expected goals (1.33 scored). They maintain 56.7% possession and generate 18.3 shots per game, but have only 33% BTTS and 0% over 2.5 goals so far. NEC Nijmegen's form is WWL with a higher xG of 2.36, exceeding their 2.67 goals scored per game. Their possession is even higher at 62.3%, with 18.7 shots and a full 100% BTTS and over 2.5 goals, suggesting more open games and attacking intent.

Team news & key players

Juventus's defense is anchored by Gleison Bremer (7.49 rating), contributing 1.33 key passes per 90 and 1 goal in 3 games, with strong tackling at 1.67 per 90. Midfielder Locatelli (7.24 rating) offers creativity with 2 key passes per 90 and 1 assist. NEC Nijmegen's standout is Tjaronn Chery (7.83 rating), with 3 goals, 1 assist, and an impressive 2.58 on-target shots per 90, driving their attack. Dušan Tadić provides 3 key passes per 90, though with no goals yet. Both teams have disciplined players with similar yellow card rates.

Stats & betting angles

Juventus's defense is robust with 67% clean sheets and only 0.33 goals conceded per game, contrasting NEC's 0 clean sheets and 1.33 conceded. NEC's 100% BTTS and over 2.5 goals suggest openness, while Juventus's 33% BTTS and 0% over 2.5 indicate tighter matches. Juventus averages 9.7 corners per game, slightly above NEC's 7.3. Both commit around 17 and 12.7 fouls per game respectively, with 1.67 yellow cards each, implying moderate aggression. Given NEC's attacking efficiency and Juventus's defensive solidity, betting on BTTS yes and over 2.5 goals holds value.

Verdict

This cup tie is poised for a competitive, potentially high-scoring encounter. Juventus's sturdy defense and controlled possession contrast with NEC Nijmegen's dynamic attack led by Chery's 3 goals and 2.58 OT shots per 90. The lack of head-to-head data and small sample sizes this season limit certainty, but NEC's 100% BTTS and O2.5 stats versus Juventus's defensive strength suggest a 2-1 victory for Juventus with both teams scoring and over 2.5 goals. Expect a tight but open game.

Martin Anderson
Martin Anderson
Human analyst

Professional betting analyst with 10+ years of experience in sports data analytics and statistics. Featured on The Athletic, 433, and ESPN. Currently maintaining a 70% win rate this season across European football markets. See the public track record.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the recent form of both teams impact the expected match outcome?

Juventus enters with a DWW run, scoring 1.33 goals and conceding 0.33 per game, while NEC Nijmegen's WWL includes a stronger attack at 2.67 goals and 1.33 conceded. Juventus's defensive solidity contrasts NEC's more open style, suggesting Juventus might control defensively but NEC's firepower could create scoring chances. The small 3-game samples limit predictive power, but NEC's higher xG (2.36 vs. 1.88) signals their threat.

What does the xG profile reveal about each team's attacking and defensive quality?

Juventus's xG is 1.88 for and 0.33 against per game, showing efficient defense and moderate attack. NEC Nijmegen's xG is higher at 2.36 for and 1.71 against, indicating a more attacking but vulnerable setup. NEC's 2.67 goals scored per game slightly exceed their xG, suggesting clinical finishing, while Juventus's 1.33 goals are below xG, implying some finishing inefficiency. Defensive differences will be key.

Which key attackers are likely to influence the match and what are their per-90 stats?

NEC's Tjaronn Chery is the key attacker with 3 goals, 1 assist, 2.95 shots, and 2.58 on-target shots per 90 minutes, making him the main goal threat. Dušan Tadić complements with 3 key passes per 90, facilitating chances. Juventus's Gleison Bremer contributes 1.33 key passes and 1 goal per 90, while R. Kolo Muani offers 2 shots per 90 but no goals yet. Chery's clinical finishing gives NEC an edge.

How vulnerable are both teams defensively based on goals conceded and clean sheets?

Juventus concedes only 0.33 goals per game and keeps clean sheets 67% of the time, showing defensive solidity. NEC Nijmegen concedes 1.33 goals per game and has 0 clean sheets, indicating defensive frailty. This contrast suggests Juventus's defense will be tested by NEC's attack, but Juventus may control the match defensively, crucial in a knockout cup tie.

What justifies the BTTS (both teams to score) selection for this match?

NEC Nijmegen has a 100% BTTS rate this season, scoring 2.67 and conceding 1.33 goals per game, reflecting open matches. Juventus has a 33% BTTS rate but concedes only 0.33 goals, suggesting fewer goals conceded. However, NEC's attacking efficiency with players like Chery (3 goals) and high xG (2.36) suggests they will score, while Juventus's attack and NEC's conceding record indicate both teams likely to find the net.

Is the over/under 2.5 goals bet supported by the teams' current stats?

NEC Nijmegen's 100% over 2.5 rate with 2.67 goals scored and 1.33 conceded per game strongly supports an over 2.5 goals outcome. Juventus has 0% over 2.5 with 1.33 scored and 0.33 conceded, indicating tighter matches. The combination suggests a match likely to exceed 2.5 goals due to NEC's attacking prowess and Juventus's occasional defensive lapses.

Are there any head-to-head trends or historical data influencing this match prediction?

No head-to-head data exists between Juventus and NEC Nijmegen, making historical trend analysis impossible. This lack of direct encounters increases reliance on current season stats and last season's baseline, which is unavailable for both teams. Consequently, predictions focus on form, xG, and player performances rather than historical results.

Where lies the betting value in this match considering the stats provided?

Betting value lies in backing Juventus to win 2-1 with BTTS yes and over 2.5 goals due to NEC's attacking firepower (2.67 goals pg, 100% BTTS/O2.5) against Juventus's solid defense (0.33 goals conceded pg, 67% CS). NEC's finishing efficiency and Chery's 3 goals suggest they will score, while Juventus's better defensive record and home advantage imply a narrow victory. The contrasting styles create a high-probability, value-packed market.

Explore more predictions

Best betting partners on this match

Top pick
Roobet logo

Roobet

10.0

Instant Rakeback + $100K Weekly Raffle

Why we picked this: Official betting partner of Chelsea FC in Latin America

Reviewed by our team
visa
tether
bitcoin
ethereum
usd_coin
22Bet logo

22Bet

9.9

100% Welcome Bonus up to €122

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Betwinner logo

Betwinner

9.5

Exclusive 100% Sports Bonus up to $130

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Megapari logo

Megapari

9.7

200% Welcome Bonus up to $100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Melbet logo

Melbet

9.3

100% Sportsbook Bonus up to €100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
1WIN logo

1WIN

8.9

500% Welcome Package up to €1000

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+

This match has ended

See Today's Picks
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our cookie policy.