Fast Filters

&

LaLiga iconLaLiga
FC Barcelona logoReal Madrid CF logo
In 0m
FCB vs RMA

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Liverpool FC logoBrighton & Hove Albion FC logo
In 0m
LIV vs BHA

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Manchester United FC logoAFC Bournemouth logo
In 0m
MUN vs BOU

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Chicago Blackhawks logoFlorida Panthers logo
In 0m
BLA vs PAN

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
FC Internazionale Milano logoACF Fiorentina logo
In 0m
INT vs FIO

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Utah Jazz logoLos Angeles Lakers logo
In 0m
JAZ vs LAK

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Brooklyn Nets logoIndiana Pacers logo
In 0m
NET vs PAC

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Dallas Stars logoNew York Islanders logo
In 0m
STA vs ISL

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Crystal Palace FC logoNewcastle United FC logo
In 0m
CRY vs NEW

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
US Lecce logoJuventus FC logo
In 0m
USL vs JUV

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Sunderland AFC logoLeeds United FC logo
In 0m
SUN vs LEE

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Winnipeg Jets logoMontreal Canadiens logo
In 0m
JET vs CAN

Browse

Ligue 1 iconLigue 1
Paris Saint-Germain FC logoOlympique Lyonnais logo
In 0m
PSG vs LYO

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Philadelphia 76ers logoDetroit Pistons logo
In 0m
76E vs PIS

Browse

NBA logoNBA
New York Knicks logoOrlando Magic logo
In 0m
KNI vs MAG

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Nashville Predators logoColorado Avalanche logo
In 0m
PRE vs AVA

Browse

Ligue 1 iconLigue 1
AS Monaco FC logoLille OSC logo
In 0m
ASM vs LIL

Browse

Eredivisie iconEredivisie
Fortuna Sittard logoSBV Excelsior logo
10'
SIT 0–0 EXC

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Genoa CFC logoJuventus FC logo
In 0m
GEN vs JUV

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Vancouver Canucks logoMinnesota Wild logo
In 0m
CAN vs WIL

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Venezia FC logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
VEN vs INT

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Minnesota Timberwolves logoToronto Raptors logo
In 0m
TIM vs RAP

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Oklahoma City Thunder logoLos Angeles Clippers logo
In 0m
THU vs CLI

Browse

NHL logoNHL
New York Rangers logoLos Angeles Kings logo
In 0m
RAN vs KIN

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Monza logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
MON vs NAP

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Chelsea FC logoManchester United FC logo
In 0m
CHE vs MUN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Manchester City FC logoBrighton & Hove Albion FC logo
In 0m
MCI vs BHA

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Edmonton Oilers logoDetroit Red Wings logo
In 0m
OIL vs WIN

Browse

Bundesliga iconBundesliga
FC Bayern München logoBorussia Dortmund logo
In 0m
FCB vs BVB

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Cleveland Cavaliers logoMinnesota Timberwolves logo
In 0m
CAV vs TIM

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Miami Heat logoDallas Mavericks logo
In 0m
HEA vs MAV

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Calgary Flames logoToronto Maple Leafs logo
In 0m
FLA vs LEA

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Milan logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
MIL vs INT

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Tottenham Hotspur FC logoCrystal Palace FC logo
In 0m
TOT vs CRY

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Aston Villa FC logoFulham FC logo
In 0m
AVL vs FUL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Philadelphia Flyers logoColumbus Blue Jackets logo
In 0m
FLY vs JAC

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Brentford FC logoNottingham Forest FC logo
In 0m
BRE vs NOT

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Sacramento Kings logoMemphis Grizzlies logo
In 0m
KIN vs GRI

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Charlotte Hornets logoWashington Wizards logo
In 0m
HOR vs WIZ

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Dallas Stars logoNew Jersey Devils logo
In 0m
STA vs DEV

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
AFC Bournemouth logoLeeds United FC logo
In 0m
BOU vs LEE

Browse

NHL logoNHL
St. Louis Blues logoMontreal Canadiens logo
In 0m
BLU vs CAN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Chicago Blackhawks logoLos Angeles Kings logo
In 0m
BLA vs KIN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Carolina Hurricanes logoBoston Bruins logo
In 0m
HUR vs BRU

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Winnipeg Jets logoFlorida Panthers logo
In 0m
JET vs PAN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Utah Mammoth logoMinnesota Wild logo
In 0m
MAM vs WIL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Vegas Golden Knights logoOttawa Senators logo
In 0m
KNI vs SEN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Nashville Predators logoNew York Islanders logo
In 0m
PRE vs ISL

Browse

Chicago Fire VS New England Prediction & Betting Tips - AI Analysis & Odds (Sep 13, 2026)

Chicago Fire FC logo

Chicago Fire

FT
1 - 2

HT: 0-1

New England Revolution logo

New England

MLS·Soldier Field

Comparison of analyst and AI predictions

Predicto AI

Predicto AI

Correct

Both Teams to Score

View Reasoning
Both teams have demonstrated strong scoring ability, with Chicago Fire FC featuring an 80% BTTS rate and New England Revolution at 60%. Historically, their head-to-head encounters have also resulted in a total of 50 goals in 15 matches, further supporting the likelihood of both teams finding the net. Therefore, betting on Both Teams to Score is a solid prediction.
Human Analyst

Human Analyst

Correct

Over 2.5 goals

View Reasoning
With Chicago Fire FC averaging 2.67 goals per match over their last 20 games and a 75% rate for Over 2.5 goals, this match is likely to see multiple goals. Additionally, both teams have shown a propensity for scoring, as evidenced by Chicago's 80% BTTS rate and New England's 60%. Given these statistics, betting on Over 2.5 goals is a strong choice.
Split call — see both takes above

Key Stats

Chicago Fireper gameNew England Revolution
1.8
xG for
1.5
1.3
xG against
1.3
51.3
Possession %
50.5
13.7
Shots
12
Chicago Fire — last 5
DDDDW
New England Revolution — last 5
WWDWL

Overview

Chicago Fire and New England Revolution meet with close standings: 4th (38 pts) vs 5th (37 pts). Chicago last season scored 2.0 pg, conceded 1.8; New England 1.3 scored, 1.5 conceded. This season, Chicago averages 1.91 goals and concedes 1.43, New England 1.65 scored and 1.22 conceded. Both teams show attacking intent but defensive vulnerabilities, setting the stage for a competitive match.

Form & xG

Chicago’s recent form is DDDDW with a 1.8 xG for and 1.27 against this season, slightly above New England’s 1.5 xG for and 1.32 against. Chicago’s possession edges at 51.3% versus New England’s 50.5%. Both have BTTS rates above 60% this season (74% Chicago, 61% New England) and over 2.5 goals in 74% and 65% of matches respectively, suggesting an open game.

Team News & Key Players

Chicago’s top contributor is M. Haile-Selassie with 7 goals and 4 assists, 1.81 shots and 0.93 on target per 90. Zinckernagel adds 5 goals, 8 assists. New England relies on Carles Gil (8G, 4A, 3.01 key passes/90) and Dor Turgeman (6G, 4A, 1.99 shots/90). Goalkeepers Brady (6.93 rating) and Turner (7.54) add solidity but both defenses have conceded at least 1.2 goals per game.

Stats & Betting Angles

Chicago averages 4.1 corners per game, New England 4.5, both above fouls (Chicago 12.5, New England 9.9) and cards (2.26 yellow Chicago, 1.73 New England) per match. Last five head-to-heads show frequent high-scoring draws and wins, including 3-2 and 2-2 results. Over 2.5 goals and BTTS are strong betting angles given 74% and 61% season BTTS rates and recent H2H scores.

Verdict

Expect a competitive, open game with goals from both sides. Chicago’s marginally better scoring and home advantage, combined with New England’s resilience and key creators Gil and Turgeman, suggest a 2-1 win for Chicago. BTTS and Over 2.5 goals are likely, supported by last season’s baseline and current season form despite small sample size.

Martin Anderson
Martin Anderson
Human analyst

Professional betting analyst with 10+ years of experience in sports data analytics and statistics. Featured on The Athletic, 433, and ESPN. Currently maintaining a 70% win rate this season across European football markets. See the public track record.

Frequently Asked Questions

How has recent form influenced the expected outcome between Chicago Fire and New England Revolution?

Chicago's recent form shows four draws and one win (DDDDW) with a strong home presence, while New England has two wins, two draws, and one loss (WWDWL). Chicago’s consistent draws reflect a solid defense but limited finishing, whereas New England's mixed results indicate some inconsistency. Chicago’s 1.91 goals per game this season slightly outpace New England’s 1.65, suggesting a narrow advantage for Chicago.

What does the xG profile suggest about the attacking and defensive strengths of both teams?

Chicago’s xG is 1.8 for and 1.27 against, showing a slightly stronger attack and better defensive record than New England’s 1.5 for and 1.32 conceded. This aligns with Chicago’s higher goals per game (1.91 vs 1.65). The relatively close xG conceded suggests both defenses are vulnerable, but Chicago’s marginally better numbers hint at a slight edge in creating and preventing chances.

Which key players are likely to influence the match and what are their per-90 stats?

Chicago’s M. Haile-Selassie leads with 7 goals, 4 assists, 1.81 shots and 0.93 on target per 90. Zinckernagel adds 5 goals, 8 assists, 1.92 shots and 0.96 OT/90. New England’s Carles Gil is crucial with 8 goals, 4 assists, 3.01 key passes per 90 and 1.5 shots. Dor Turgeman contributes 6 goals, 4 assists, 1.99 shots and 0.99 OT/90. These attacking stats suggest these players will be central.

How do defensive frailties impact the likelihood of goals in this match?

Both teams concede over 1.2 goals per game this season: Chicago 1.43, New England 1.22, with last season Chicago conceding 1.8 and New England 1.5. Clean sheet rates are low (Chicago 26%, New England 22% this season). This defensive vulnerability supports BTTS and over 2.5 goals, as both sides have shown susceptibility to conceding.

Why is BTTS a strong betting option for this fixture?

BTTS occurs in 74% of Chicago’s and 61% of New England’s matches this season, supported by last season’s patterns. Recent head-to-heads have multiple high-scoring draws (e.g., 2-2 twice, 3-3) and close wins with both teams scoring. Given defensive records and attacking per-90 stats of key players, BTTS is a logical and historically consistent bet.

What supports the Over 2.5 goals prediction in this match?

Over 2.5 goals has occurred in 74% of Chicago’s and 65% of New England’s matches this season. Last season Chicago averaged 2.0 goals per game with 1.8 conceded, suggesting open games. Recent head-to-heads feature 3-2, 2-2, and 3-3 scorelines. Both teams’ attacking stats (shots per game around 13.7 and 12) and defensive frailty favor over 2.5 goals.

How do recent head-to-head results inform the expected match dynamics?

Recent H2H matches include 2-2 draws twice (2025-10-18, 2023-09-24), a 3-2 Chicago win (2025-09-07), and a 3-3 draw (2023-05-27). These high-scoring, close results highlight attacking strength and defensive gaps. The balance of wins and draws with goals on both sides suggests a competitive, open game with multiple goals.

Is there any betting value in this match based on stats and form?

Given Chicago’s slightly better scoring (1.91 vs 1.65 goals pg) and home advantage, combined with New England’s attacking threats, betting on Chicago to win 2-1 with BTTS and Over 2.5 goals offers value. The high BTTS and Over 2.5 percentages (74%, 65%) and recent H2H trends support these markets. Defensive frailty increases goal likelihood, making these bets statistically sound.

Explore more predictions

Best betting partners on this match

Top pick
Roobet logo

Roobet

10.0

Instant Rakeback + $100K Weekly Raffle

Why we picked this: Official betting partner of Chelsea FC in Latin America

Reviewed by our team
visa
tether
bitcoin
ethereum
usd_coin
22Bet logo

22Bet

9.9

100% Welcome Bonus up to €122

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Betwinner logo

Betwinner

9.5

Exclusive 100% Sports Bonus up to $130

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Megapari logo

Megapari

9.7

200% Welcome Bonus up to $100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Melbet logo

Melbet

9.3

100% Sportsbook Bonus up to €100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
1WIN logo

1WIN

8.9

500% Welcome Package up to €1000

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+

This match has ended

See Today's Picks
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our cookie policy.