Fast Filters

&

Premier League iconPremier League
Liverpool FC logoArsenal FC logo
In 0m
LIV vs ARS

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Juventus FC logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
JUV vs NAP

Browse

Vienna logoVienna
LT
Alex de Minaur logo
In 0m
TIE vs MIN(18/8)

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Real Racing Club de Santander logoReal Madrid CF logo
In 0m
SAN vs RMA

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Philadelphia Flyers logoColumbus Blue Jackets logo
In 0m
FLY vs JAC

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
FC Barcelona logoDeportivo Alavés logo
In 0m
FCB vs ALA

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Boston Celtics logoBrooklyn Nets logo
In 0m
CEL vs NET

Browse

Vienna logoVienna
Karen Khachanov logoCarlos Alcaraz logo
In 0m
KHA vs ALC(25/3)

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Utah Jazz logoMemphis Grizzlies logo
Q4
JAZ 101–104 GRI

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Dallas Stars logoNew Jersey Devils logo
In 0m
STA vs DEV

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Athletic Club logoReal Sociedad de Fútbol logo
In 0m
ATH vs RSO

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Levante UD logoClub Atlético de Madrid logo
In 0m
LEV vs ATL

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Villarreal CF logoRCD Espanyol de Barcelona logo
In 0m
VIL vs ESP

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Winnipeg Jets logoFlorida Panthers logo
In 0m
JET vs PAN

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Real Betis Balompié logoMálaga CF logo
In 0m
BET vs MAL

Browse

NBA logoNBA
New York Knicks logoDetroit Pistons logo
In 0m
KNI vs PIS

Browse

NBA logoNBA
San Antonio Spurs logoSacramento Kings logo
In 0m
SPU vs KIN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
St. Louis Blues logoMontreal Canadiens logo
In 0m
BLU vs CAN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Newcastle United FC logoEverton FC logo
In 0m
NEW vs EVE

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Genoa CFC logoJuventus FC logo
In 0m
GEN vs JUV

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Venezia FC logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
VEN vs INT

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Carolina Hurricanes logoBoston Bruins logo
In 0m
HUR vs BRU

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Monza logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
MON vs NAP

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Chicago Blackhawks logoLos Angeles Kings logo
In 0m
BLA vs KIN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Chelsea FC logoManchester United FC logo
In 0m
CHE vs MUN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Manchester City FC logoBrighton & Hove Albion FC logo
In 0m
MCI vs BHA

Browse

Bundesliga iconBundesliga
FC Bayern München logoBorussia Dortmund logo
In 0m
FCB vs BVB

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Utah Mammoth logoMinnesota Wild logo
In 0m
MAM vs WIL

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Milan logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
MIL vs INT

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Vegas Golden Knights logoOttawa Senators logo
In 0m
KNI vs SEN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Tottenham Hotspur FC logoCrystal Palace FC logo
In 0m
TOT vs CRY

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Aston Villa FC logoFulham FC logo
In 0m
AVL vs FUL

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Brentford FC logoNottingham Forest FC logo
In 0m
BRE vs NOT

Browse

NHL logoNHL
San Jose Sharks logoBuffalo Sabres logo
In 0m
SHA vs SAB

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
AFC Bournemouth logoLeeds United FC logo
In 0m
BOU vs LEE

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Nashville Predators logoNew York Islanders logo
In 0m
PRE vs ISL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Anaheim Ducks logoVancouver Canucks logo
In 0m
DUC vs CAN

Browse

Charlotte VS Chicago Fire Prediction & Betting Tips - AI Analysis & Odds (Sep 26, 2026)

Charlotte FC logo

Charlotte

FT
0 - 1

HT: 0-0

Chicago Fire FC logo

Chicago Fire

MLS·Bank of America Stadium

Comparison of analyst and AI predictions

Predicto AI

Predicto AI

Incorrect

Both Teams to Score

@1.40
View Reasoning
Both teams have a strong tendency to score, with Chicago Fire FC boasting a remarkable 90% BTTS rate and Charlotte FC at 50%. The recent head-to-head record also indicates a competitive nature, with both teams having scored frequently in their past encounters. Given these statistics, the bet on both teams to score is highly recommended.
Human Analyst

Human Analyst

Incorrect

Over 2.5 goals

@1.45
View Reasoning
Considering both teams' scoring capabilities, Charlotte FC has scored 34 goals while Chicago Fire FC has netted 37, leading to an average of around 4 goals per match in their head-to-head encounters. Additionally, Chicago Fire's 80% rate for over 2.5 goals suggests a high likelihood of multiple goals being scored in this matchup. Therefore, the bet on over 2.5 goals is a solid choice.
Split call — see both takes above

Key Stats

Charlotteper gameChicago Fire
1.5
xG for
1.8
1.4
xG against
1.3
46.2
Possession %
51.3
11.5
Shots
13.7
Charlotte — last 5
WDWWD
Chicago Fire — last 5
DDDDW

Overview

Charlotte and Chicago Fire sit close in the standings at 5th and 4th respectively, both with 39 points, setting up a crucial clash. Charlotte averages 1.75 goals scored and 1.38 conceded per game, while Chicago Fire shows slightly higher attacking output at 1.91 scored and 1.43 conceded. Chicago's possession edge (51.3% vs 46.2%) and better xG (1.8 vs 1.49) suggest a marginal attacking superiority. Both teams have BTTS rates above 65%, indicating a likelihood of goals at both ends.

Form & xG

Charlotte's recent form is strong with WDWWD in their last five, and their xG per game of 1.49 aligns closely with their 1.75 goals scored, showing slight finishing overperformance. Chicago Fire's form is less convincing with DDDDW but their xG of 1.8 exceeds their 1.91 goals, indicating efficient finishing. Both teams concede around 1.4 goals per game, consistent with their xG conceded (1.4 Charlotte, 1.27 Chicago), pointing to defensive vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

Team news & key players

Charlotte's offensive threat centers on Pep Biel (1.72 shots/90, 0.88 OT/90, 10G 6A) and I. Toklomati Giorno (1.67 shots/90, 0.89 OT/90, 8G 2A), both capable creators and finishers. Chicago Fire relies heavily on P. Zinckernagel (1.92 shots/90, 0.96 OT/90, 5G 8A) and M. Haile-Selassie (1.81 shots/90, 0.93 OT/90, 7G 4A), combining goal threat with key passes above 1.9 per 90. Defensively, both teams show below-average clean sheet rates (Charlotte 21%, Chicago 26%), emphasizing potential for goals.

Stats & betting angles

Both sides average around 4-5 corners per game (Charlotte 4.6, Chicago 4.1) with match totals near 10, indicating moderate attacking pressure. Fouls and yellows are similar (Charlotte 9.7 fouls, 2 yellows; Chicago 12.5 fouls, 2.26 yellows per game), suggesting a competitive but not overly aggressive game. BTTS and Over 2.5 percentages are high for both (Charlotte 67% BTTS, 67% O2.5; Chicago 74% BTTS, 74% O2.5), supporting a bet on both teams scoring and a higher scoring match.

Verdict

Given the close standings, strong attacking xG profiles, and defensive frailties, this game promises an open contest. Chicago holds a slight edge in possession and shot volume, but Charlotte's form and finishing suggest they can score. The high BTTS and Over 2.5 stats on both sides and low clean sheet rates point towards a 2-1 scoreline with goals at both ends and over 2.5 total goals.

Martin Anderson
Martin Anderson
Human analyst

Professional betting analyst with 10+ years of experience in sports data analytics and statistics. Featured on The Athletic, 433, and ESPN. Currently maintaining a 70% win rate this season across European football markets. See the public track record.

Frequently Asked Questions

How has recent form influenced the expected outcome?

Charlotte's recent form is strong with 3 wins and 2 draws in the last five games (WDWWD), scoring 1.75 goals per game, which slightly exceeds their xG of 1.49, indicating good finishing. Chicago Fire has a less convincing run (DDDDW) but still manages 1.91 goals per game, close to their xG of 1.8. This suggests Charlotte's better recent form may balance Chicago's slightly superior attacking metrics.

What does the xG profile indicate about both teams’ attacking and defensive strengths?

Charlotte’s xG for is 1.49 with goals scored at 1.75, showing slight finishing overperformance, while their xG against is 1.4, matching conceded goals at 1.38, indicating defensive vulnerability. Chicago Fire’s xG for is higher at 1.8 and goals at 1.91, showing efficient attack, with xG against 1.27 and goals conceded 1.43, suggesting some defensive lapses. Both teams have attacking edge but fragile defenses.

Which key attackers are likely to influence the match outcome based on per-90 stats?

For Charlotte, Pep Biel (1.72 shots/90, 0.88 OT/90, 10G 6A) and I. Toklomati Giorno (1.67 shots/90, 0.89 OT/90, 8G 2A) are main threats. Chicago Fire’s P. Zinckernagel (1.92 shots/90, 0.96 OT/90, 5G 8A) and M. Haile-Selassie (1.81 shots/90, 0.93 OT/90, 7G 4A) combine high shot and key pass rates over 1.9/90, indicating strong creative and finishing potential.

How do defensive frailties impact the likelihood of goals in this fixture?

Both teams concede around 1.4 goals per game (Charlotte 1.38, Chicago 1.43) with clean sheet rates below 30% (Charlotte 21%, Chicago 26%), highlighting defensive instability. This increases the probability of both teams scoring, supported by BTTS rates of 67% for Charlotte and 74% for Chicago. The fixture is thus prone to goals at both ends.

Why is BTTS a strong betting angle for this match?

BTTS is compelling because Charlotte and Chicago Fire have BTTS rates of 67% and 74% respectively, reflecting frequent goals conceded and scored. Both teams concede roughly 1.4 goals per game and have low clean sheet percentages, indicating defensive vulnerabilities. The attacking stats (shots, key passes) and finishing rates support a game where both sides find the net.

What supports the prediction of over 2.5 goals in this game?

Over 2.5 goals is supported by both teams’ O2.5 percentages: Charlotte at 67% and Chicago at 74%. Their combined average goals per game exceed 3.1, with each side scoring and conceding around 1.4 goals. The attacking volumes (11.5 and 13.7 shots per game) and key players’ shooting stats further back a high-scoring match.

How does the lack of head-to-head history affect the match analysis?

No recent head-to-head data means reliance on current season and last-season baseline stats, which show similar strengths and weaknesses in both teams. This absence increases uncertainty but also suggests a balanced match-up. The analysis leans on attacking outputs, possession, and defensive records to predict a competitive, goal-filled game.

Is there betting value in the predicted outcome and scoreline?

The prediction of a 2-1 win for Chicago Fire with BTTS Yes and Over 2.5 aligns with both teams’ high BTTS (67% and 74%) and O2.5 (67% and 74%) stats. The closeness in standings and stats suggests a tight match, supporting a narrow margin. Given Charlotte’s recent form and Chicago’s attacking efficiency, the odds for this exact scoreline likely offer value.

Explore more predictions

Best betting partners on this match

Top pick
Roobet logo

Roobet

10.0

Instant Rakeback + $100K Weekly Raffle

Why we picked this: Official betting partner of Chelsea FC in Latin America

Reviewed by our team
visa
tether
bitcoin
ethereum
usd_coin
22Bet logo

22Bet

9.9

100% Welcome Bonus up to €122

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Betwinner logo

Betwinner

9.5

Exclusive 100% Sports Bonus up to $130

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Megapari logo

Megapari

9.7

200% Welcome Bonus up to $100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Melbet logo

Melbet

9.3

100% Sportsbook Bonus up to €100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
1WIN logo

1WIN

8.9

500% Welcome Package up to €1000

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+

This match has ended

See Today's Picks
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our cookie policy.