Fast Filters

&

Premier League iconPremier League
Liverpool FC logoArsenal FC logo
In 0m
LIV vs ARS

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Juventus FC logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
JUV vs NAP

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Real Racing Club de Santander logoReal Madrid CF logo
In 0m
SAN vs RMA

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Dallas Stars logoNew York Islanders logo
In 0m
STA vs ISL

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
FC Barcelona logoDeportivo Alavés logo
In 0m
FCB vs ALA

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Utah Jazz logoLos Angeles Lakers logo
In 0m
JAZ vs LAK

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Brooklyn Nets logoIndiana Pacers logo
In 0m
NET vs PAC

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Winnipeg Jets logoMontreal Canadiens logo
In 0m
JET vs CAN

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Athletic Club logoReal Sociedad de Fútbol logo
In 0m
ATH vs RSO

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Villarreal CF logoRCD Espanyol de Barcelona logo
In 0m
VIL vs ESP

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
Levante UD logoClub Atlético de Madrid logo
In 0m
LEV vs ATL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Nashville Predators logoColorado Avalanche logo
In 0m
PRE vs AVA

Browse

LaLiga iconLaLiga
FC Barcelona logoReal Madrid CF logo
In 0m
FCB vs RMA

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Philadelphia 76ers logoDetroit Pistons logo
In 0m
76E vs PIS

Browse

NBA logoNBA
New York Knicks logoOrlando Magic logo
In 0m
KNI vs MAG

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Vancouver Canucks logoMinnesota Wild logo
In 0m
CAN vs WIL

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Udinese Calcio logoAC Milan logo
7'
UDI 0–1 MIL

Browse

Eredivisie iconEredivisie
AZ logoFC Twente '65 logo
HT
AZ 0–0 TWE

Browse

Liga Portugal iconLiga Portugal
CD Nacional logoSporting Clube de Braga logo
88'
CDN 1–0 SCB

Browse

NHL logoNHL
New York Rangers logoLos Angeles Kings logo
In 0m
RAN vs KIN

Browse

Liga Portugal iconLiga Portugal
Rio Ave FC logoFC Famalicão logo
90'
RIO 0–3 FAM

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Minnesota Timberwolves logoToronto Raptors logo
In 0m
TIM vs RAP

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Oklahoma City Thunder logoLos Angeles Clippers logo
In 0m
THU vs CLI

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Edmonton Oilers logoDetroit Red Wings logo
In 0m
OIL vs WIN

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Genoa CFC logoJuventus FC logo
In 0m
GEN vs JUV

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
Venezia FC logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
VEN vs INT

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Monza logoSSC Napoli logo
In 0m
MON vs NAP

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Calgary Flames logoToronto Maple Leafs logo
In 0m
FLA vs LEA

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Milan logoBologna FC 1909 logo
In 0m
MIL vs BOL

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Cleveland Cavaliers logoMinnesota Timberwolves logo
In 0m
CAV vs TIM

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Miami Heat logoDallas Mavericks logo
In 0m
HEA vs MAV

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Philadelphia Flyers logoColumbus Blue Jackets logo
In 0m
FLY vs JAC

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Chelsea FC logoManchester United FC logo
In 0m
CHE vs MUN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Manchester City FC logoBrighton & Hove Albion FC logo
In 0m
MCI vs BHA

Browse

Bundesliga iconBundesliga
FC Bayern München logoBorussia Dortmund logo
In 0m
FCB vs BVB

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Dallas Stars logoNew Jersey Devils logo
In 0m
STA vs DEV

Browse

Serie A iconSerie A
AC Milan logoFC Internazionale Milano logo
In 0m
MIL vs INT

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Sacramento Kings logoMemphis Grizzlies logo
In 0m
KIN vs GRI

Browse

NBA logoNBA
Charlotte Hornets logoWashington Wizards logo
In 0m
HOR vs WIZ

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Winnipeg Jets logoFlorida Panthers logo
In 0m
JET vs PAN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Tottenham Hotspur FC logoCrystal Palace FC logo
In 0m
TOT vs CRY

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Aston Villa FC logoFulham FC logo
In 0m
AVL vs FUL

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
Brentford FC logoNottingham Forest FC logo
In 0m
BRE vs NOT

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Chicago Blackhawks logoLos Angeles Kings logo
In 0m
BLA vs KIN

Browse

Premier League iconPremier League
AFC Bournemouth logoLeeds United FC logo
In 0m
BOU vs LEE

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Carolina Hurricanes logoBoston Bruins logo
In 0m
HUR vs BRU

Browse

NHL logoNHL
St. Louis Blues logoMontreal Canadiens logo
In 0m
BLU vs CAN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Utah Mammoth logoMinnesota Wild logo
In 0m
MAM vs WIL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Vegas Golden Knights logoOttawa Senators logo
In 0m
KNI vs SEN

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Nashville Predators logoNew York Islanders logo
In 0m
PRE vs ISL

Browse

NHL logoNHL
Anaheim Ducks logoVancouver Canucks logo
In 0m
DUC vs CAN

Browse

Leverkusen VS Celje Prediction & Betting Tips - AI Analysis & Odds (Sep 16, 2026)

Bayer 04 Leverkusen logo

Leverkusen

FT
2 - 0

HT: 1-0

NK Celje logo

Celje

UEFA Europa League·BayArena

Comparison of analyst and AI predictions

Predicto AI

Predicto AI

Incorrect

Both Teams to Score

@2.15
View Reasoning
Both Teams to Score is a strong bet considering Leverkusen's 60% BTTS rate and NK Celje's 50% BTTS rate. With Leverkusen averaging 1.8 goals per game and Celje showing their ability to score with 8 goals in 2 matches, the likelihood of both teams finding the net is high. Therefore, I estim.
Human Analyst

Human Analyst

Incorrect

Over 2.5 goals

@1.21
View Reasoning
Bayer 04 Leverkusen has a solid goal-scoring record with 36 goals in 20 matches, averaging 1.8 goals per game, while NK Celje has also shown promise with 8 goals in just 2 matches. Both teams have a 50% rate for Over 2.5 goals, making this a likely outcome as Leverkusen generally produces high-scoring games, evident from their 60% BTTS rate. Given these stats, I estimate the odds for Over 2.5 goals.
Split call — see both takes above

Overview

Bayer Leverkusen hosts Celje in this cup tie with both sides yet to earn points in the competition, Leverkusen sitting 18th and Celje 7th. Leverkusen's only game this season saw them score 2 but concede 3, indicating defensive frailty. Celje’s last season baseline shows they scored and conceded 2 goals per game across 4 matches, suggesting a similarly open style. No historical head-to-head data exists, adding unpredictability.

Form & xG

Leverkusen’s 1.88 xG and 1.27 xGA this season indicate offensive promise but defensive vulnerabilities, confirmed by 3 goals conceded in their single match. They averaged 67% possession and 21 shots (4 on target), showing dominance in chance creation. Celje’s limited data prevents current xG analysis, but last season they averaged 2 goals scored and conceded per game, with no clean sheets in 4 matches, highlighting a tendency for high-scoring affairs.

Team News & Key Players

Leverkusen’s Patrik Schick is a key attacker, averaging 5 shots and 1 on target per 90 minutes, with 1 goal in his only appearance, while Ibrahim Maza contributes 3 shots and 4 key passes per 90. Defensively, Edmond Tapsoba registered 2 tackles per 90 but the team conceded thrice in their opener. Celje’s Milot Avdyli scored their only goal last season, averaging 1 shot and 1 on target per 90, but the team lacks standout offensive stats.

Stats & Betting Angles

Leverkusen’s games have 100% BTTS and Over 2.5 goals this season, reflecting their open play and defensive lapses. Celje’s last season data shows 0 clean sheets and 2 goals conceded per game, supporting BTTS likelihood. Leverkusen’s 3 corners per game (below match average 7) and 15 fouls per game suggest a physical but not overly dominant set-piece profile. Cards have been moderate with 2 yellows per game for Leverkusen.

Verdict

Given Leverkusen’s high xG and possession dominance but defensive vulnerability, combined with Celje’s tendency for conceding and scoring 2 goals per game last season, a high-scoring game with both teams scoring is expected. The lack of head-to-head history and small sample sizes this season mean the last season baseline heavily influences this prediction. Expect a 2-1 win for Leverkusen with BTTS and Over 2.5 goals.

Martin Anderson
Martin Anderson
Human analyst

Professional betting analyst with 10+ years of experience in sports data analytics and statistics. Featured on The Athletic, 433, and ESPN. Currently maintaining a 70% win rate this season across European football markets. See the public track record.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does the recent form and xG of Bayer Leverkusen influence this prediction?

Leverkusen’s single match this season shows a 1.88 xG and 1.27 xGA with 2 goals scored and 3 conceded, reflecting offensive strength but defensive vulnerability. Their 67% possession and 21 shots (4 OT) demonstrate attacking dominance. Despite the small sample, these numbers suggest Leverkusen will create chances but may concede, supporting a BTTS and Over 2.5 prediction.

What does Celje’s last season baseline tell us about their defensive and offensive tendencies?

Celje averaged 2 goals scored and 2 conceded per game over 4 matches last season with no clean sheets, indicating a propensity for open, high-scoring games. This defensive frailty combined with moderate offensive output suggests they are likely to both score and concede, reinforcing the BTTS and Over 2.5 goals expectation.

Who are the key attackers and what are their per-90 shooting stats?

For Leverkusen, Patrik Schick leads with 5 shots and 1 on target per 90 minutes, scoring 1 goal in his only appearance. Ibrahim Maza contributes 3 shots per 90 and 4 key passes, indicating creative involvement. Celje’s Milot Avdyli averages 1 shot and 1 on target per 90 with 1 goal last season, but overall Celje lacks prolific attacking stats.

What defensive issues are present and how might they affect BTTS?

Leverkusen conceded 3 goals in their only match despite high possession, with defender Edmond Tapsoba making only 2 tackles per 90. Celje conceded 2 goals per game last season with no clean sheets in 4 matches. Both teams’ defensive frailties strongly support a BTTS outcome.

Why is BTTS likely and how does it relate to Over/Under 2.5 goals?

Leverkusen’s 100% BTTS and Over 2.5 record this season, combined with Celje’s 2 goals conceded per game last season and no clean sheets, indicate both teams tend to concede and score. This synergy makes BTTS Yes and Over 2.5 goals the consistent and logical betting outcomes.

Are there any head-to-head trends to consider?

No historical head-to-head data exists between Bayer Leverkusen and Celje, so predictions rely heavily on this season’s limited data and last season’s baseline stats rather than direct matchup trends.

What betting value angles emerge from the stats?

Leverkusen’s high xG (1.88) and possession (67%) suggest attacking dominance, but conceding 3 goals signals value in BTTS and Over 2.5 markets. Celje’s last season 2 goals conceded per game and no clean sheets reinforce this. The corner count (3 vs match avg 7) and moderate fouls (15 per game) suggest no extreme set-piece dominance, focusing value on goal markets rather than corners or cards.

Explore more predictions

Best betting partners on this match

Top pick
Roobet logo

Roobet

10.0

Instant Rakeback + $100K Weekly Raffle

Why we picked this: Official betting partner of Chelsea FC in Latin America

Reviewed by our team
visa
tether
bitcoin
ethereum
usd_coin
22Bet logo

22Bet

9.9

100% Welcome Bonus up to €122

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Betwinner logo

Betwinner

9.5

Exclusive 100% Sports Bonus up to $130

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Megapari logo

Megapari

9.7

200% Welcome Bonus up to $100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
Melbet logo

Melbet

9.3

100% Sportsbook Bonus up to €100

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+
1WIN logo

1WIN

8.9

500% Welcome Package up to €1000

Reviewed by our team
visa
skrill
tether
bitcoin
Claim Free BetTerms & Conditions · 18+

This match has ended

See Today's Picks
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our cookie policy.